Phylogenetic Studies on Didelphid Marsupials I. Introduction and Preliminary Results from Nuclear IRBP Gene Sequences
By S. Jansa, R. Voss. Journal of mammalian evolution, 2004
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41478780abac94cfa7d37d40e3e9b2af5d661004
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Molecular Biology
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- On the Contents of Gracilinanus Gardner and Creighton, 1989, with the Description of a Previously Unrecognized Clade of Small Didelphid Marsupials (2005, methodology): “All sequences analyzed in this report have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers AF257675–AF247710 (from Jansa and Voss, 2000), AY233765– AY233791 (from Voss and Jansa, 2003), and AY957486–AY957494 (from this project). Phylogenetic analyses of nonmolecular characters, IRBP sequences, and ”
- Phylogenetics of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Muroidea, Cricetidae), with special reference to the akodont group, and with additional comments on historical biogeography (2003, methodology): “IRBP sequences were amplified, following Jansa and Voss (2000), using a touchdown protocol with four stages.”
- Phylogenetic Relationships and Classification of Didelphid Marsupials, an Extant Radiation of New World Metatherian Mammals (2009, methodology): “IRBP sequences are available from 43 didelphid terminal taxa (including Caluromysiops and Lestodelphys) and 7 nondidelphid outgroups.”
- PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES ON DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS II. NONMOLECULAR DATA AND NEW IRBP SEQUENCES: SEPARATE AND COMBINED ANALYSES OF DIDELPHINE RELATIONSHIPS WITH DENSER TAXON SAMPLING (2003, methodology): “…didelphid specimens from which morphological characters were scored and from which DNA was sequenced for this study (including those sequenced by Jansa and Voss, 2000) were identified by first-hand comparisons with types, original descriptions, or other relevant sources of taxonomic information.”