Prospects for genomic selection in forage plant species

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Plant drought survival under climate change and strategies to improve perennial grasses. A review (2016, background): “However, the declining cost of these technologies means that their employment more widely is now becoming likely (Hayes et al. 2013; Resende et al. 2014).”
Genomic selection in forest tree breeding: the concept and an outlook to the future (2014, background): “In some grass and turf species, a breeding cycle can take as long as 5 years (Hayes et al. 2013).”
Achievements and Challenges in Improving Temperate Perennial Forage Legumes (2015, background): “Genomic selection (GS) (also known as “whole-genome selection”) (Heffner et al., 2009; Jannink et al., 2010; Lorenz et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2013) is based on the premise that markers saturating the entire genome can reliably provide an estimate, in aggregate, of the breeding value of an individu”
StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed‐ploidy level populations (2013, background): “…generate genomic relationship matrixes from mixed-ploidy backgrounds will also be fundamental to the application of genomic selection strategies for crop and forage plants (Hayes et al. 2013), as well as parentage testing and management of genetic diversity (Hayes et al. 2009; Goddard et al. 2011).”