An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice
By Joseph Sarkis, James J. Cordeiro. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001
389 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4115cd31e676e82daae165bcb2ff9aa2fc08690e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Nicola Misani
- Elisabeth Albertini
- Sergio Manrique
- Stefano Pogutz
- Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester
- Mehmet Ali Ilgin
- Samir K. Srivastava
- Surendra Mohan Gupta
In Marketing
- Sergio Manrique
- Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester
- Thomas Noordewier
- Stefano Pogutz
- Nicola Misani
- Marilyn T. Lucas
- Elisabeth Albertini
- Mehmet Ali Ilgin
In Strategy and Management
- Sergio Manrique
- Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester
- Thomas Noordewier
- Stefano Pogutz
- Nicola Misani
- Marilyn T. Lucas
- Mehmet Ali Ilgin
- Surendra Mohan Gupta
Citations in the corpus
- Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. (2010, methodology): “Sarkis and Cordeiro (2001) use DEA to present the performance differences between pollution prevention and end of pipe environmental management policies.”
- Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors (2016, background): “Menguc et al., 2010), others show a negative relationship (Sarkis and Cordeiro, 2001), while yet others fail to establish any relationship.3 A potentially productive – though largely unexplored – approach to illuminating the EMP-FP relationship is that offered by Reinhardt (1998), who argues that…”
- Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach (2014, background): “The natural logarithm of the firm’s total assets was included to control for firm Size, as research has shown that firm size is an antecedent of firm responses to environmental issues (Darnall et al., 2010; King and Lenox, 2002; Sarkis and Cordeiro, 2001).”
- Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review (2007, methodology): “…(1998, 2001), Scheuring et al. (1994), Seliger et al. (1994) and Taleb and Gupta (1997) discuss design for disassembly, whereas Gupta and Sharma (1995), He et al. (2004), Jahre (1995), Jayaraman et al. (1999), Johnson (1998) and Sarkis and Cordeiro (2001) deal with design for waste minimization.”
- Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance in Developed and Developing Countries (2017, background): “Authors Sample Financial Variable(CFP) Environmental Variable (CEP) Control Variable Methodology Relationship CAVACO AND CRIFO (2014) [30] 595 European firms2002–2007 ROA (1) Tobin’s Q (2) Environmental score Sales, total assets, debt ratio, R&D ratio, advertising ratio, industry, country, year, hum”
- Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review (2013, background): “…ratio Clemens (2006) 76 4 0.163 Firm’s green program Insurance premium, rewards Cordeiro and Sarkis (1997) 523 8 –0.077 Recovering, recycling, treatment of TRI release Industry analyst earnings forecast Sarkis and Cordeiro (2001) 482 4 –0.087 TRI, end-of-pipe control ROS pollution prevention”