Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality?

By Thierry Mora, William Bialek. 2010

776 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many of life’s most fascinating phenomena emerge from interactions among many elements—many amino acids determine the structure of a single protein, many genes determine the fate of a cell, many neurons are involved in shaping our thoughts and memories. Physicists have long hoped that these collective behaviors could be described using the ideas and methods of statistical mechanics. In the past few years, new, larger scale experiments have made it possible to construct statistical mechanics models of biological systems directly from real data. We review the surprising successes of this “inverse” approach, using examples from families of proteins, networks of neurons, and flocks of birds. Remarkably, in all these cases the models that emerge from the data are poised near a very special point in their parameter space—a critical point. This suggests there may be some deeper theoretical principle behind the behavior of these diverse systems.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/410086da214d32f44d2d2952807b72d87467c828

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Miguel Angel Muñoz
  2. Michael Breakspear
  3. Paolo Moretti
  4. Andrew Zalesky
  5. Nicholas M. Timme
  6. Luca Cocchi
  7. Leonardo L. Gollo
  8. William Bialek

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Miguel Angel Muñoz
  2. Paolo Moretti
  3. Nicola Corradi
  4. Laurence Aitchison
  5. Peter E. Latham
  6. Andrew Zalesky
  7. Michael Breakspear
  8. Irene Giardina

In Molecular Biology

  1. Miguel Angel Muñoz
  2. Thierry Mora
  3. William Bialek
  4. Paolo Moretti
  5. Matteo Figliuzzi
  6. Peter E. Latham
  7. Laurence Aitchison
  8. Nicola Corradi

Citations in the corpus