A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management

By Stefan Hajkowicz, K. Collins. 2007

716 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40e2c62bc3e15b43745c682f3e2d0d79902c531e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning (2015, neutral): “T hese spatial MCDM techniques are capable of improving the transparency and analytic rigour of the land use decisions (Dunning et al., 2000; Hajkowicz & Collins, 2006).”
Improved method to calculate a water poverty index at local scale (2010, neutral): “In this respect, if multicriteria analysis entails full noncompensability, the use of a geometric aggregation might be an in-between solution Nardo et al. 2005; Hajkowicz and Collins 2007 .”
Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops (2018, background): “The majority of previous MCDM applications mainly focus on using MCDM to rank the priority of predefined management options or planning scenarios (Xevi and Khan, 2005; Hajkowicz and McDonald, 2006; Ananda and Herath, 2008; Hajkowicz, 2008).”
Exploring and Evaluating Scenarios for a River Catchment in Northern Australia Using Scenario Development, Multi-criteria Analysis and a Deliberative Process as a Tool for Water Planning (2011, background): “The role of MCA in public decision-making about natural resources is well recognised (Beinat and Nijkamp 1998; Gamper and Turcanu 2007; Hajkowicz 2008; Hajkowicz and Collins 2007).”
Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach (2011, methodology): “The DMCE method has been applied in the natural resource management arena as a decision-aid tool (Bojorquez-Tapia et al. 2005; Hajkowicz and Collins 2007 ), but it has only recently been used to assist IAS decision-making (Cook and Proctor 2007; Hurley et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2010;”
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management (2011, background): “MCDA methods are ideal for water resources management and planning and are usually preferred to other methods for various reasons including transparency and accountability to decision procedures, ability to resolve conflicts and use of formal axioms of decision theory to inform choice (Hajkowicz and”
Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits (2016, methodology): “The approach has been largely applied for water resource management (Hajkowicz and Collins, 2007).”