The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees

By M. Finn, Suzanne Muirhead-Steves. 2002

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40d70c70f81c61bc0ef30b2cd5ed6f12d481445d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Elliott

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Elliott
2. Dan Nagin

Citations in the corpus

• Using Narrative in Social Research (2005, methodology): “The use of the Cox proportional hazards model is relatively common in criminological research on recidivism (Baumer, 1997; Finn and Muirhead-Steves, 2002; Gainey et al., 2000).”
• Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? (2005, unknown): “Of the included studies, only Finn and Muirhead-Steves (2002) reported outcomes at multiple times.”
• The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sentences on re-offending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge (2006, background): “…prisoners who, after a considerable time in custody, have been paroled (and transferred to a program of electronic monitoring), and those who had to serve their entire sentence (as in the case of the studies by Finn and Muirhead-Steves 2002, and by Bonta J., Wallace-Capretta S., Rooney J. 2000).”