Zero Static Power Dissipation Biasing of RSFQ Circuits
By D. Kirichenko, S. Sarwana, A. Kirichenko. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity, 2011
301 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40cd5d6c69f835403165f89d54fb1065ee358d11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Condensed Matter Physics
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Advanced Fabrication Processes for Superconducting Very Large-Scale Integrated Circuits (2015, methodology): “A 100 pH inductor in the SFQ4ee process node occupies more than 100 μm2 area, which severely limits the integration scale of ERSFQ circuits.”
- Energy-Efficient Single Flux Quantum Technology (2011, methodology): “In general, these biasing Josephson junctions automatically generate sufficient voltage to maintain the average voltage at the common node at in each respective branch, maintaining the bias current in each branch close to critical current of the limiting bias junction [21], [ 25 ].”
- Superconductor digital electronics: Scalability and energy efficiency issues (Review Article) (2016, methodology): “To provide reliable switching by an SFQ pulse and set the direction of SFQ pulse/flux propagation, almost all JJs in the circuits are current-biased at a value Ib ≈ 0.7Ic, using a network of either bias resistors and a common voltage rail (as in RSFQ) or a network of inductors and current-limiting j”