Training a Single Sigmoidal Neuron Is Hard
By Jirí Síma. 2002
61 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yuanzhi Li
- Jason D. Lee
- Simon Shaolei Du
- Daniel Soudry
- Matthias Hein
- Elad Hoffer
- Lu Lu
- Quynh N. Nguyen
Citations in the corpus
- Convergence Analysis of Two-layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activation (2017, background): “Most previous results on learning neural network are negative [39, 28, 38], or positive but with algorithms other than SGD [23, 43, 37, 14, 15, 16], or with strong assumptions on the model [1, 2].”
- Exponentially vanishing sub-optimal local minima in multilayer neural networks (2017, background): “However, theoretical explanations seem to lag far behind this empirical success (though many hardness results exist , e.g. , (Síma, 2002; Shamir, 2016)).”
- The loss surface and expressivity of deep convolutional neural networks (2017, background): “…well known that the optimization problem for training neural networks can have exponentially many local minima (Auer et al., 1996; Safran & Shamir, 2016) and NP-hardness has been shown in many cases (Blum & Rivest., 1989; Sima, 2002; Livni et al., 2014; Shamir, 2017; Shalev-Shwartz et al., 2017).”
- Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks through Tensor Factorization (2015, background): “There are extensive negative results on training neural networks, and training even simple networks with guaranteed generalization bounds, e.g., a network with a single neuron, is NP-hard (Rojas, 1996; ˇS´ıma, 2002; Blum and Rivest, 1993; Bartlett and Ben-David, 1999; Kuhlmann, 2000).”
- Global optimization issues in deep network regression: an overview (2018, background): “Even the WO problems arising in the easiest architecture of network (shallow network with few neurons) are NP-hard [23,128], so that the structure of the problem does not allow any simplification.”
- Collapse of Deep and Narrow Neural Nets (2018, result): “While the aforementioned theoretical results are very powerful, they do not necessarily coincide with the results of training of NNs in practice which is NP-hard ( ˇ S ´ ıma, 2002).”
- The Loss Surface of Deep and Wide Neural Networks (2017, background): “It has been shown that the training of a network with a single neuron with a variety of activation functions turns out to be NP-hard (Sima, 2002).”
- Beating the Perils of Non-Convexity: Guaranteed Training of Neural Networks using Tensor Methods (2017, background): “The findings are mostly negative (Rojas, 1996; Š́ıma, 2002; Blum and Rivest, 1993; Bartlett and Ben-David, 1999; Kuhlmann, 2000).”
- Trends and Applications in Constructive Approximation Evolutionary Optimization of Neural Systems: the Use of Strategy Adaptation (unknown): “However, the general question of how to efficiently design an appropriate neural system for a given problem remains open and complexity theory reveals the need for using heuristics (e.g., [41]).”
- Optimization Landscape and Expressivity of Deep CNNs (2017, background): “…well known that the optimization problem for training neural networks can have exponentially many local minima (Auer et al., 1996; Safran & Shamir, 2016) and NP-hardness has been shown in many cases (Blum & Rivest., 1989; Sima, 2002; Livni et al., 2014; Shamir, 2017; Shalev-Shwartz et al., 2017).”