Generalized stacking fault energies, ductilities, and twinnabilities of Ni and selected Ni alloys

By Donald J. Siegel. 2005

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40a9f13822a0dc8a4e4b454914a1401201184b66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. T. Ezaz
2. Michael D. Sangid
3. H. Sehitoglu
4. I. M. Robertson
5. Piyas Chowdhury

In Materials Chemistry

1. Michael D. Sangid
2. H. Sehitoglu
3. Piyas Chowdhury
4. T. Ezaz
5. John Lambros
6. I. M. Robertson

In Mechanical Engineering

1. T. Ezaz
2. Michael D. Sangid
3. John Lambros
4. H. Sehitoglu
5. I. M. Robertson
6. Piyas Chowdhury

Citations in the corpus

• A revisit to atomistic rationale for slip in shape memory alloys (2017, background): “dle) is essentially similar to that of an extended dislocation in an fcc lattice [122,123].”
• Energy of slip transmission and nucleation at grain boundaries (2011, methodology): “to values from experiments, density functional theory [60] and the”
• Slip transfer and plastic strain accumulation across grain boundaries in Hastelloy X (2012, background): “This EAM potential was chosen to match the intrinsic, gSF¼127 mJ/m2, and unstable, gUS¼255 mJ/m2, stacking fault energies of the material, which compare well with experimental values of 125–128 mJ/m2 and ab initio calculations of 273 mJ/m2 for the gSF and gUS energies, respectively (Siegel, 2005).”