Modelling the crystalline deformation of native and regenerated cellulose

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Anisotropy of the elastic properties of crystalline cellulose Iβ from first principles density functional theory with Van der Waals interactions (2013, result): “Comparison with previous publications (Matsuo et al. 1990; Eichhorn and Davies 2006; Nakamura et al. 2004) shows results that are in good agreement with the values reported in this study.”
An estimation of the Young’s modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments (2008, methodology): “difference between the stiffness of the two allomorphs of cellulose-I (Eichhorn and Davies 2006).”
Tensile strength of Iβ crystalline cellulose predicted by molecular dynamics simulation (2014, methodology): “The elastic properties of CNC have been studied using molecular mechanics (MM) (Reiling and Brickmann 1995; Tanaka and Iwata 2006; Eichhorn and Davies 2006; Wu et al. 2013) and molecular dynamics (MD) (Bergenstråhle et al.”
Surface only modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibres with organic acids (2011, background): “They found that bacterial cellulose nanofibres possess a Young’s modulus of 114 GPa, with a theoretical Young’s modulus of between 130 and 160 GPa depending on its crystal form ( Eichhorn and Davies 2006; Reiling and Brickmann 1995).”