The Evolution of High Incomes in Northern America: Lessons from Canadian Evidence

By Emmanuel Saez, M. Veall. 2005

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/408bad1f8c7ac974245dbe4c89443cebd9381aa7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

"Jobs and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data." (2012, background): “Various authors (Atkinson, 2007; Atkinson and Salverda, 2005; Saez and Veall, 2005; and many other studies cited in Atkinson and Piketty, 2007, Saez 2006 and Roine, Vlachos, and Waldenstrom 2008) have constructed top income shares for other countries as well, and have shown that top income shares…”
The Distribution of Top Incomes in Australia (2007, unknown): “We are interested in the total returnable income that would enter the tax-base if there were no exemptions (income after subtracting the exemptions is referred to as taxable income): “total income that would have been reported on tax returns, had everybody been required to file a tax return” (Saez a”
Long-Run Trends in the Distribution of Income and Wealth (2014, unknown): “Saez (2004) shows that changes in marginal tax rates over the period 1960– 2000 can explain variation in top income shares in the U.”
Estimating Taxable Income Responses using Danish Tax Reforms (2014, background): “…tax rates at the top of the income distribution, including the United Kingdom (Brewer, Saez, and Shephard 2010), Canada (Sillamaa and Veall 2001; Saez and Veall 2005), Norway (Aarbu and Thoresen 2001), Sweden (e.g. Hansson 2007; Blomquist and Selin 2010; Gelber 2012), and Poland (Kopczuk…”
Technical Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking outside the Wage Structure (2006, background): “Krueger and Pischke (1998), Card, Kramarz, and Lemieux (1999), Acemoglu (2003), Piketty and Saez (2003), and Saez and Veall (2005), e.g., discuss the puzzle of differential inequality trends in continental European countries and the United States/United Kingdom in recent decades.”
The Evolution of Top Incomes in an Egalitarian Society; Sweden, 1903-2004 (2006, background): “3 Other recent studies include Australia (Atkinson and Leigh, 2006), Canada (Saez and Veall, 2005), Germany (Dell, 2005), Ireland (Nolan, 2007), Japan (Moriguchi and Saez, 2006), the Netherlands (Atkinson and Salverda, 2005), New Zealand (Atkinson and Leigh, 2005), Spain (Alvaredo and Saez, 2006)…”
How Closely Do Top Income Shares Track Other Measures of Inequality (2007, unknown): “These are Australia (Atkinson and Leigh, 2007a), Canada (Saez and Veall, 2005), France (Piketty, 2001, 2003, 2007), Germany (Dell, 2005, 2007), Ireland (Nolan, 2007), Japan (Moriguchi and Saez, 2006), the Netherlands (Salverda and Atkinson 2007), New Zealand (Atkinson and Leigh, 2005), Spain (Alvare”
The Changing Shape of Global Inequality 1820–2000; Exploring a New Dataset (2014, unknown): “3 Studies are available for Australia (1921-2003) (Atkinson and Leigh 2007a), Canada (1920-2000) (Saez and Veall 2005), France (1905-1998) (Piketty 2007), Germany (1925-1998) (Dell 2007), India (1922-1999) (Bannerjee and Piketty 2003), Indonesia (1920-2004) (Leigh and Van der Eng 2010), Ireland (192”