CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE FROM THE PALOMAR TRANSIENT FACTORY: INDICATIONS FOR A DIFFERENT POPULATION IN DWARF GALAXIES

By I. Arcavi, A. Gal-yam, Mansi M. Kasliwal, R. Quimby, Eran Ofek, Shrinivas R. Kulkarni, P. Nugent, S. Cenko, Joshua S. Bloom, M. Sullivan and 19 more. 2010

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use the first compilation of 72 core-collapse supernovae (SNe) from the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) to study their observed subtype distribution in dwarf galaxies compared to giant galaxies. Our sample is the largest single-survey, untargeted, spectroscopically classified, homogeneous collection of core-collapse events ever assembled, spanning a wide host-galaxy luminosity range (down to Mr ≈ −14 mag) and including a substantial fraction (>20%) of dwarf (Mr ⩾ −18 mag) hosts. We find more core-collapse SNe in dwarf galaxies than expected and several interesting trends emerge. We use detailed subclassifications of stripped-envelope core-collapse SNe and find that all Type I core-collapse events occurring in dwarf galaxies are either SNe Ib or broad-lined SNe Ic (SNe Ic-BL), while “normal” SNe Ic dominate in giant galaxies. We also see a significant excess of SNe IIb in dwarf hosts. We hypothesize that in lower metallicity hosts, metallicity-driven mass loss is reduced, allowing massive stars that would have appeared as “normal” SNe Ic in metal-rich galaxies to retain some He and H, exploding as Ib/IIb events. At the same time, another mechanism allows some stars to undergo extensive stripping and explode as SNe Ic-BL (and presumably also as long-duration gamma-ray bursts). Our results are still limited by small-number statistics, and our measurements of the observed N(Ib/c)/N(II) number ratio in dwarf and giant hosts (0.25+0.3−0.15 and 0.23+0.11−0.08, respectively; 1σ uncertainties) are consistent with previous studies and theoretical predictions. As additional PTF data accumulate, more robust statistical analyses will be possible, allowing the evolution of massive stars to be probed via the dwarf-galaxy SN population.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4084f381d33769dc10354e1120b7acb1f3b7254c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. N. Smith
  2. A. Filippenko
  3. E. Berger
  4. S. Smartt
  5. Weidong Li
  6. Ryan Chornock
  7. Stan Woosley
  8. B. Metzger

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. N. Smith
  2. T. Thompson
  3. D. Maoz
  4. J. Beacom
  5. Krzysztof Zbigniew Stanek
  6. C. Kochanek
  7. A. Gal-yam
  8. A. Filippenko

Citations in the corpus