PBFT vs Proof-of-Authority: Applying the CAP Theorem to Permissioned Blockchain
By Stefano De Angelis, Leonardo Aniello, Roberto Baldoni, Federico Lombardi, Andrea Margheri, Vladimiro Sassone. Italian Conference on Cybersecurity, 2018
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4052d479c69c9b424df4f352d61cb5b4df85f352
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Nour Moustafa
- Benjamin P. Turnbull
- Osama Alkadi
- Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
- Muhammad Baqer Mollah
- Ala Al-Fuqaha
- Khaled Hamed Salah
- Jun Zhao
Citations in the corpus
- A Deep Blockchain Framework-Enabled Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Protecting IoT and Cloud Networks (2021, methodology): “Third, PBFT is a popular consensus protocol currently being implemented in Hyperledger Fabric [20].”
- The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth (2020, background): “The term PoA usually involves different levels of security, from mathematically proven and long-established, fully fault-tolerant mechanisms (Paxos, PBFT) over heuristically-secure algorithms, such as Istanbul BFT and Aura, to basic crash-tolerant mechanisms such as RAFT (De Angelis et al. 2017).”
- Blockchain for Future Smart Grid: A Comprehensive Survey (2019, background): “Proof of Authority (PoA): The PoA [53] is designed particularly for permissioned blockchain.”
- A Comprehensive Review of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms (2021, background): “Moreover, the procedure of discerning authorities results in the centralized configuration of PoA, which makes this approach appropriate for private consortiums [63], [110].”
- Blockchain for AI: Review and Open Research Challenges (2019, background): “A PoA protocol works by delegating authoritative control to specific nodes that collectively form the consensus based on majority votes to create new blocks on the network [100].”