Comparing and Combining Theories to Explain Proenvironmental Intentions

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human Responses to Climate Change: Social Representation, Identity and Socio-psychological Action (2014, background): “Thus, for example, while Wall, Devine-Wright, and Mill (2007) argued that their study of car use choices in the UK highlighted the importance of personal obligation, altruism, and a sense of control, we would argue that these are not just individual level variables, but they are informed by…”
A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Three Theories of Pro-Environmental Behavior (2011, background): “Other studies found support for the influence of norms on more specific behaviors such as energy use (Black et al., 1985), recycling (Oom Do Valle et al., 2005), and travel-mode choice (Wall et al., 2007).”
Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures (2020, unknown): “…Davies et al., 2016; Han et al., 2010; Harland et al., 1999; Litvine and Wüstenhagen, 2011; Mannetti et al., 2004; Tarkiainen and Sundqvist, 2005; Wall et al., 2007), which leads to the next hypothesis: H 4 : Perceived social norm influences attitude towards environment positively in…”