The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity.

By L. T. Phillips, Brian S. Lowery. 2015

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/403816fd67237506148d5ec50e4f8352cb8bb251

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. W. Liu
2. Brian S. Lowery

In Social Psychology

1. W. Liu
2. L. T. Phillips
3. Brian S. Lowery

In Sociology and Political Science

1. W. Liu
2. L. T. Phillips
3. Brian S. Lowery
4. J. O’Neil

Citations in the corpus

• Why Welch’s test is Type I error robust (2016, background): “As part of an investigation into sensitivity when exposed to evidence of "White Privilege", Phillips and Lowery (2015) randomly allocated U.”
• White Male Power and Privilege: The Relationship Between White Supremacy and Social Class (2017, background): “But as Phillips and Lowery (2015) argues, “Whites suffer hardships, and sometimes greater hardships than particular minorities; however, Whites’ non-racial hardships are irrelevant to racial privilege” (p. 13).”
• Herd Invisibility: The Psychology of Racial Privilege (2018, background): “…have found that when confronted with evidence that they benefit from White privilege, Whites may engage in dismantling—for instance, supporting policies specifically said to harm Whites (Leach et al., 2002; Lowery, Chow, & Randall-Crosby, 2009; Phillips & Lowery, 2015; see Knowles et al., 2014).”