A review of algorithms for medical image segmentation and their applications to the female pelvic cavity
By Zhen Ma, J. Manuel, R. S. Tavares, Renato Natal, Teresa Mascarenhas, Roberto Frias, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2010
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper aims to make a review on the current segmentation algorithms used for medical images. Algorithms are classified according to their principal methodologies, namely the ones based on thresholds, the ones based on clustering techniques and the ones based on deformable models. The last type is focused on due to the intensive investigations into the deformable models that have been done in the last few decades. Typical algorithms of each type are discussed and the main ideas, application fields, advantages and disadvantages of each type are summarised. Experiments that apply these algorithms to segment the organs and tissues of the female pelvic cavity are presented to further illustrate their distinct characteristics. In the end, the main guidelines that should be considered for designing the segmentation algorithms of the pelvic cavity are proposed.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/402e470b15d76bc45b7a0e1a6c739835bb525403
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Biomedical Engineering
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Medical image registration: a review (2014, background): “Reviews on image segmentation techniques can be found in (Zhang, 2001; Zhang and Lu, 2004; Monteiro, 2007; Gonzalez and Woods, 2008; Ma et al., 2010b).”
- Detection of plant leaf diseases using image segmentation and soft computing techniques (2017, background): “Authors in paper [22], classified an algorithm on the basis of the principal methodologies.”