Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques

By Arijit Chaudhuri, R. Mukerjee. 1987

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Marginal Release Under Local Differential Privacy (2017, background): “We ﬁrst formally deﬁne the classic mechanism for releasing a single bit b i under privacy by having the user lie with some probability [5].”
Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico (2004, methodology): “At the end of the survey, we asked the random-response question, using an unrelated question with known probability (Chaudhuri and Mukerjee 1998).”
A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data (2011, methodology): “The problem of getting reliable data for quantitative variables was first discussed by Greenberg et al. (1971) and Eriksson (1973) who extended the unrelated question model (Horvitz et al.”
Randomized Response, Statistical Disclosure Control and Misclassificatio: a Review (2002, methodology): “see Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1988, Section 3.3). As stated before, national statistical institutes prefer a model free approach. Consequently, Kooiman et al. (1997) present only the extra variance due to applying PRAM, and do not assume a multinomial distribution.”
Engineering Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating (2006, background): “To specifically address the question “Why do students cheat?” researchers have typically divided reasons for cheating into three categories—psychological [36–39], demographic [40], and situational [3, 39, 41].”
How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs (2005, background): “Maintenance of privacy and efficiency of the design are therefore in conflict with each other (Chaudhuri and Mukerjee, 1988).”
Privacy at Scale: Local Differential Privacy in Practice (2018, methodology): “We introduce the most basic LDP mechanism, randomized response [6, 27], which came from the survey design community, and masks a single”
Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information (2009, unknown): “Except for the first ideas described in Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1988) and recently in Allen andSingh (2001),Grewal et al.”
A two-stage stratified Warner’s randomized response model using optimal allocation (2005, background): “It should be noted that Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1988) and Singh and Mangat (1996) provide more comprehensive reviews of the RR literature.”