Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programs: Evidence from France, 1986–1988

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Programme Evaluation with Multiple Treatments (2004, methodology): “Germany, Larsson (2000) for Sweden, Brodaty et al. (2001) for France, Gerfin and”
Active Labor Market Policies (2016, background): “…in postconflict situations in developing countries, where many young people affected by war remain 7For example, Caliendo et al. (2005), Brodaty et al. (2002), and Gerfin et al. (2005) simultaneously evaluate both types of programs Bloom (2010) provides information on socalled…”
Can training and employment subsidies combat European unemployment (2002, background): “training content (the more costly measures) seem to be most likely to improve employment probability (Raaum and Torp, 2002; Brodaty et al., 2001; Kluve et al, 1999; van Ours, 2001).”
Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching (2008, background): “This is of particular interest if the ‘timing of events’ plays a crucial role (see e.g. Brodaty et al., 2001; Sianesi, 2004).”
A Microeconometric Evaluation of Rehabilitation of Long-term Sickness in Sweden (2004, unknown): “' First applications of this approach are Brodaty et al. (2001), Dorsett (2001) and Larsson (2003).”
Voluntary Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries: Mexico’s Clean Industry Program (2010, unknown): “[10], Sianesi [44], and Pizer et al.”