Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity

By K. Locey, J. Lennon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016

987 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance Ecological scaling laws are intensively studied for their predictive power and universal nature but often fail to unify biodiversity across domains of life. Using a global-scale compilation of microbial and macrobial data, we uncover relationships of commonness and rarity that scale with abundance at similar rates for microorganisms and macroscopic plants and animals. We then show a unified scaling law that predicts the abundance of dominant species across 30 orders of magnitude to the scale of all microorganisms on Earth. Using this scaling law combined with the lognormal model of biodiversity, we predict that Earth is home to as many as 1 trillion (1012) microbial species. Scaling laws underpin unifying theories of biodiversity and are among the most predictively powerful relationships in biology. However, scaling laws developed for plants and animals often go untested or fail to hold for microorganisms. As a result, it is unclear whether scaling laws of biodiversity will span evolutionarily distant domains of life that encompass all modes of metabolism and scales of abundance. Using a global-scale compilation of ∼35,000 sites and ∼5.6⋅106 species, including the largest ever inventory of high-throughput molecular data and one of the largest compilations of plant and animal community data, we show similar rates of scaling in commonness and rarity across microorganisms and macroscopic plants and animals. We document a universal dominance scaling law that holds across 30 orders of magnitude, an unprecedented expanse that predicts the abundance of dominant ocean bacteria. In combining this scaling law with the lognormal model of biodiversity, we predict that Earth is home to upward of 1 trillion (1012) microbial species. Microbial biodiversity seems greater than ever anticipated yet predictable from the smallest to the largest microbiome.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fe682858d6447a2a9315668a4969a1e8a30dc50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Petr Pyšek
  2. D. Richardson
  3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
  4. P. Hulme
  5. H. MacIsaac
  6. Daniel Simberloff
  7. M. Vilà
  8. A. Ricciardi

In Genetics

  1. Daniel Simberloff
  2. D. Richardson
  3. Petr Pyšek
  4. James T. Carlton
  5. Ramon Rosselló-Mora
  6. T. Blackburn
  7. Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis
  8. R. Amann

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. P. Hulme
  2. H. MacIsaac
  3. D. Richardson
  4. A. Ricciardi
  5. Rob Knight
  6. Petr Pyšek
  7. Jonathan M. Jeschke
  8. Daniel Simberloff

Citations in the corpus