Compiler techniques for code compaction

By Saumya K. Debray, William S. Evans, Robert Muth, B. D. Sutter. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 2000

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fc6515efb7a8176c35aa7e33f4c31b7edc81d2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Chanchal Kumar Roy
2. James R. Cordy
3. Raghavan Komondoor
4. Susan Horwitz

In Hardware and Architecture

1. Chanchal Kumar Roy
2. James R. Cordy
3. Raghavan Komondoor
4. Susan Horwitz

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: A qualitative approach (2009, unknown): “h Applied to assembler code [26, 34, 32, 45] LP.”
• A Survey on Software Clone Detection Research (2007, methodology): “Helps in code compacting: Clone detection techniques can be used for compact device by reducing the source code size [49, 61].”
• Using Slicing to Identify Duplication in Source Code (2001, methodology): “Debray et al [8] use the CFG to find clones in assembly-language programs for the purpose of code compression.”