Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities

By G. Federici, R. Kemp, D. Ward, C. Bachmann, T. Franke, S. González, C. Lowry, M. Gadomska, J. Harman, B. Mészáros and 3 more. 2014

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fc3c30bb55a531eae134339e73bef2a4439c81b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. G. Pintsuk
2. S. Zinkle
3. L. Snead

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. S. Zinkle

Citations in the corpus

• Developing structural, high-heat flux and plasma facing materials for a near-term DEMO fusion power plant: The EU assessment (2014, methodology): “Additionally a systems engineering approach, similar to that of the EU DEMO design process [4], was adopted to: analyse the problems of sub-systems with assemblies of materials; highlight trade-offs and constraints; and prioritise R&D needs.”
• Overview of the DEMO staged design approach in Europe (2019, background): “The main differences between ITER and DEMO and the outstanding DEMO design and technology challenges, where knowledge gaps exist, are discussed in [47,48].”
• European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials (2017, background): “using mostly near-ITER technology) to minimize technological risks; and an ‘advanced’, higher-performance (but with less mature physics and technology assumptions), steady-state option DEMO [3].”