Fair Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks Using Queue-Length-Based Scheduling and Congestion Control
By Atilla Eryilmaz, Rayadurgam Srikant. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2005
590 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fb91268745c698c0b6277288a02be4b854e2f74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Michael J. Neely
- Mung Chiang
- Rayadurgam Srikant
- John C. Doyle
- Steven H. Low
- Atilla Eryilmaz
- Sanjay Shakkottai
- Ness B. Shroff
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Michael J. Neely
- Mung Chiang
- Rayadurgam Srikant
- John C. Doyle
- Atilla Eryilmaz
- Steven H. Low
- Sanjay Shakkottai
- Alexander L. Stolyar
Citations in the corpus
- Resource Allocation and Cross-Layer Control in Wireless Networks (2006, background): “LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev.2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 298-102 Vol. , No (2006) 1 143 c 2006 now Publishers Inc. Resource Allocation and Cross Layer Control in Wireless Networks Leonidas Georgiadis1, Michael Neely2 and Leandros Tassiulas3”
- Fairness and Optimal Stochastic Control for Heterogeneous Networks (2005, methodology): “We note that alternative optimization approaches have recently been considered in [29], [35] using fluid limit models, and in [36] using stochastic gradient theory (see, for example, [37]).”
- Cross-Layer Congestion Control, Routing and Scheduling Design in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks (2006, background): “, H(x) = Rx); fair scheduling in cellular network in the downlink [6] where the servers correspond to the wireless links from the base station to the users and the routing corresponds to an identity function; and TCP [20] with time-varying capacity as in lasthop wireless networks where each (wired o”
- Joint congestion control, routing, and MAC for stability and fairness in wireless networks (2006, methodology): “In [9], [15], [20], and [25], the authors propose and study rate control algorithms that adapt the flow rates instantaneously as a function of the entry queue-lengths.”
- Layering as Optimization Decomposition: A Mathematical Theory of Network Architectures (2007, methodology): “3) Channel level stochastic: Models in [17], [35], [81], [99], [128] consider random channel fluctuations.”
- Maximizing Queueing Network Utility Subject to Stability: Greedy Primal-Dual Algorithm (2005, methodology): “Thus the main di erence of the algorithm in [6] from the corresponding special case of GPD algorithm is the \static" traÆc generation rule, di erent from the \greedy" rule employed by GPD algorithm (see generating switch rule (101) above).”
- Network Optimization and Control (2008, background): “Such fluctuations can be incorporated into the stochastic models in [11–14].”
- A tutorial on cross-layer optimization in wireless networks (2006, background): “Channel variations: Both formulations can be generalized to the case with channel variations (e.g., due to fading and/or mobility of the nodes), in which case only the scheduling component needs to be changed [30] , [33], [40].”