Early-Type Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. IV. Colors and Chemical Evolution

By M. Bernardi, R. Sheth, James Annis, S. Burles, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Robert Lupton, David Schlegel, Mark SubbaRao, N. Bahcall, J. Blakeslee and 19 more. 2003

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The colors and chemical abundances of early-type galaxies at redshifts z < 0.3 are studied using a sample of nearly 9000 galaxies, selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey using morphological and spectral criteria. In this sample, redder galaxies have larger velocity dispersions: g*-r* ∝ σ0.26±0.02. Color also correlates with magnitude, g* - r* ∝ (-0.025 ± 0.003)M, and size, but these correlations are entirely due to the L-σ and Ro-σ relations: the primary correlation is color-σ. The red light in early-type galaxies is, on average, slightly more centrally concentrated than the blue. Because of these color gradients, the strength of the color-magnitude relation depends on whether or not the colors are defined using a fixed metric aperture; the color-σ relation is less sensitive to this choice. Chemical evolution and star formation histories of early-type galaxies are investigated using co-added spectra of similar objects. The resulting library of co-added spectra contains spectra that represent a wide range of early-type galaxies. Chemical abundances correlate primarily with velocity dispersion: Hβ ∝ σ-0.24±0.03, Mg2 ∝ σ0.20±0.02, Mg b ∝ σ0.32±0.03, and ⟨Fe⟩ ∝ σ0.11±0.03. At fixed σ, the population at z ∼ 0.2 had weaker Mg2 and stronger Hβ absorption compared to the population at z ∼ 0. It was also bluer. Comparison of these colors and line strengths and their evolution with single-burst stellar population models suggests a formation time of 9 Gyr ago, consistent with a fundamental plane analysis of this sample. Although the fundamental plane shows that galaxies in dense regions are slightly different from galaxies in less dense regions, the co-added spectra and color-magnitude relations show no statistically significant dependence on environment.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fade948fcf62527799c866272bdc387c78a56eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. C. Conroy
  5. M. Blanton
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. Volker Springel
  8. R. Dav'e

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. C. Conroy
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. M. Cappellari
  7. M. Blanton
  8. Volker Springel

Citations in the corpus