Outside Enterpreneurial Capital
By A. Cosh, Douglas J. Cumming, A. Hughes. 2009
382 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fa0993ca1569dd2e76e0b1be7741f332abb7940
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Tom Vanacker
- Veroniek Collewaert
- Othmar Lehner
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Xavier Walthoff‐Borm
- Mike Wright
- Saul Estrin
- X. Tian
In Economics and Econometrics
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Tom Vanacker
- Veroniek Collewaert
- Othmar Lehner
- Marie C. Thursby
- A. Nicholls
- Xavier Walthoff‐Borm
- Mike Wright
Citations in the corpus
- The evolution and adoption of equity crowdfunding: entrepreneur and investor entry into a new market (2018, positive): “…traditionally financed their new ventures in steps or B stepping stones ^ (Hellman et al. 2013), often starting with personal savings, investments from friends and family and seeking support from angel investors before turning to venture capital (VC), banks or equity markets (Cosh et al. 2009).”
- The Relationship between Slack Resources and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of Venture Capital and Angel Investors (2013, positive): “First, we develop selection models predicting the receipt of VC or angel financing respectively using insights from previous research on financing decisions in entrepreneurial firms (Cosh et al., 2009; Vanacker and Manigart, 2010).”
- Equity crowdfunding, shareholder structures, and firm performance (2018, background): “Second, and more importantly, the majority of firms do not raise venture capital or angel investments (Cosh et al., 2009); they are unable or unwilling to do so.5 Thus, new capital generally comes from additional investments made by the entrepreneurs themselves, family members, or friends.”
- The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome (2014, background): “…which there are no resource constraints and firms are able to raise funds for all valuecreating projects, subsequent research has challenged this assumption, pointing to the market imperfections that lead to difficulties for new firms to obtain external financing (Cosh, Cumming, and Hughes 2009).”
- Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd (2014, background): “It is well recognized that new firms face difficulties in attracting external finance during their initial stage, be it through bank loans or equity capital (see, e.g., Berger and Udell, 1995; Cassar, 2004; Cosh et al., 2009).”
- Financing patterns of European SMEs – an empirical taxonomy (2016, neutral): “Even though, research on SME financing increased over the last years (Beck et al., 2008; Cosh et al., 2009; Chavis et al., 2011), the financing patterns of SMEs in Europe are still not well understood as most research focused on a single financing instrument (e.”
- Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda (2013, neutral): “Such peculiarities of social ventures additionally aggravate the already difficult financing situation that many start-ups find themselves in Cosh et al. (2009).”
- The demand and supply of external finance for innovative firms (2013, background): “Access to finance has figured prominently in the debate on barriers to firm growth, especially for small and medium size enterprises (SMEs), but existing empirical research has not found conclusive evidence of a ‘finance gap’ (Storey, 1994; Cosh et al. 2009a).”
- The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “We know that conventional funding sources have high rejection rates for applicants (Cosh et al., 2009) and that some potential borrowers may fail to seek outside funding because of a perception that they will be rejected (Fraser et al., 2015).”