Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment

By N. Pollesch, Virginia H. Dale. 2015

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Environmental Chemistry, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f74a9b3ac99c45bb7b7613f038ed21e2cc1f7be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Virginia H. Dale

In Environmental Chemistry

1. J. Antle
2. Marco Cinelli

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Virginia H. Dale
2. Marco Cinelli
3. P. Tittonell
4. P. Balvanera

Citations in the corpus

• When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators (2017, unknown): “functions (Pollesch and Dale, 2015) and the perspective of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) (Guitouni and Martel, 1998; Munda, 2005).”
• Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development (2016, background): “Criteria for aggregation function selection have only recently been assessed (Pollesch and Dale, 2015).”
• How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy (2020, background): “They included topics such as compensation between criteria, uncertainty management, the meaning of weights, effects of normalization and aggregation methods [31,101,136,137,23,113,73].”