THE AMBIGUITY AVERSION LITERATURE: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT
By Nabil I. Al-Najjar, Jonathan Weinstein. Economics and Philosophy, 2009
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f565f9c7f813f0527649d5798f3e6a890a37947
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Types of Uncertainty (2014, unknown): “Such is the lesson that has been drawn from Savage’s work by mainstream economics (see, for instance, Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green (1995) and Al-Najjar and Weinstein (2009)).”
- Ambiguity in asset pricing and portfolio choice: a review of the literature (2010, unknown): “ () = min ∈() [ (1) + (1− ) (2)] () = { ∈ [0 1] ≥ (1) 1− ≥ (2)} (1)”
- IS IT ALWAYS RATIONAL TO SATISFY SAVAGE'S AXIOMS? (2009, background): “3 See, for example, the standard text by Mas-Colell, Whinston, and Green (1995), and, for a recent contribution, Al-Najjar and Weinstein (2009). tension between the inability to justify any decision based on statistical data, scientific research and logical reasoning on the one hand, and the need…”
- Decision theory under ambiguity (2012, unknown): “This literature still produces hot debates as can be seen in the criticism expressed by Al Najjar and Weinstein (2009) and the replies by important authors in the field, to be published in Economics and Philosophy in 2009 or in the recent exchange between Epstein (2009) and Klibanoff, Marinacci, and”