Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds

By R. Frykberg, Jaminelli Banks. Advances in wound care, 2015

2,264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Significance: Chronic wounds include, but are not limited, to diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure ulcers. They are a challenge to wound care professionals and consume a great deal of healthcare resources around the globe. This review discusses the pathophysiology of complex chronic wounds and the means and modalities currently available to achieve healing in such patients. Recent Advances: Although often difficult to treat, an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and specific attention toward managing these perturbations can often lead to successful healing. Critical Issues: Overcoming the factors that contribute to delayed healing are key components of a comprehensive approach to wound care and present the primary challenges to the treatment of chronic wounds. When wounds fail to achieve sufficient healing after 4 weeks of standard care, reassessment of underlying pathology and consideration of the need for advanced therapeutic agents should be undertaken. However, selection of an appropriate therapy is often not evidence based. Future Directions: Basic tenets of care need to be routinely followed, and a systematic evaluation of patients and their wounds will also facilitate appropriate care. Underlying pathologies, which result in the failure of these wounds to heal, differ among various types of chronic wounds. A better understanding of the differences between various types of chronic wounds at the molecular and cellular levels should improve our treatment approaches, leading to better healing rates, and facilitate the development of new more effective therapies. More evidence for the efficacy of current and future advanced wound therapies is required for their appropriate use.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rehabilitation, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f3a8fa7dd81971772bcc63285f424e1ecce07c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Melanie Rodrigues
  2. Paulina Krzyszczyk
  3. Nina Kosaric
  4. Maja Olsson
  5. R. Bajpai
  6. Andre F. Palmer
  7. B. Conti
  8. G. Gurtner

Citations in the corpus