Ignorance: How it drives science
By S. Firestein. 2012
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f0fb621f6c4d423ef5845f66f52b3984905214f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Joaquín Hortal
- Jorge M. Lobo
- J. Diniz-Filho
- Francesco de Bello
- C. V. von Bartheld
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Jami Bahney
Citations in the corpus
- Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing (2016, unknown): “Open-mindedness helps researchers better questions that are critical for the discovery of knowledge (Firestein, 2012).”
- The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization (2017, unknown): “This is a feature, not a bug, because it fosters scientific discovery (Firestein, 2012).”
- Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity (2015, background): “( James Clerk Maxwell, quoted in Firestein 2012, p. 48) In science, ignorance refers to what we do not know.”
- The Search for True Numbers of Neurons and Glial Cells in the Human Brain: A Review of 150 Years of Cell Counting (2016, background): “…for the notion of a 10:1 GNR over a 50-year period is an example of a major failure in the scientific process that is supposed to self-correct invalid claims or reports (Committee on the Conduct of Science, 1989; Neville, 2007; Firestein, 2012; Ioannidis, 2012), as explained in more detail below.”