Estimating Dynamic Treatment Regimes in Mobile Health Using V-learning

By Daniel J. Luckett, Eric B. Laber, A. Kahkoska, David M. Maahs, E. Mayer‐Davis, Michael R. Kosorok. 2016

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The vision for precision medicine is to use individual patient characteristics to inform a personalized treatment plan that leads to the best possible healthcare for each patient. Mobile technologies have an important role to play in this vision as they offer a means to monitor a patient’s health status in real-time and subsequently to deliver interventions if, when, and in the dose that they are needed. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize individualized treatment plans as sequences of decision rules, one per stage of clinical intervention, that map current patient information to a recommended treatment. However, most existing methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes are designed for a small number of fixed decision points occurring on a coarse time-scale. We propose a new reinforcement learning method for estimating an optimal treatment regime that is applicable to data collected using mobile technologies in an outpatient setting. The proposed method accommodates an indefinite time horizon and minute-by-minute decision making that are common in mobile health applications. We show that the proposed estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal under mild conditions. The proposed methods are applied to estimate an optimal dynamic treatment regime for controlling blood glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. Nathan Kallus
  2. Masatoshi Uehara
  3. Shamim Nemati
  4. Chao Yu
  5. Jiming Liu
  6. Eric B. Laber

In General Health Professions

  1. Nathan Kallus
  2. Masatoshi Uehara
  3. Shamim Nemati

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Masatoshi Uehara
  2. Nathan Kallus
  3. Eric B. Laber
  4. Chao Yu
  5. Jiming Liu
  6. Michael R. Kosorok
  7. Shamim Nemati
  8. Stefan Wager

Citations in the corpus