Possibly All of that and Then Some: Scalar Implicatures Are Understood in Two Steps.

By John M. Tomlinson, Todd M. Bailey, Lewis Bott. 2013

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eec74db8724c9e7975f9eb7b9c53e07777a0a88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Maria Spychalska
2. Jarmo Kontinen
3. Markus Werning
4. Judith Degen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Judith Degen

In Language and Linguistics

1. Judith Degen

Citations in the corpus

• Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials (2016, background): “First, in support of the existing literature (Bott & Noveck, 2004; Huang & Snedeker, 2009; Tomlinson et al., 2013), our reaction time results provide evidence that the implicature is associated with an increased processing cost.”
• Investigating the distribution of some (but not all ) implicatures using corpora and web-based methods (2015, result): “2006), mouse movements (Tomlinson et al. 2013), and eye movements (Huang & Snedeker 2009, 2011)– points towards implicatures being costly, in support of the Literal-First hypothesis.”