Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context
By P. A. Pellegrini, S. Fotheringham. 2002
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ee3a117bd46825390db5123b54f7be826827c71
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Accommodating Spatial Correlation Across Choice Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models: Application to Modeling Residential Location Choice Behavior (2011, unknown): “As noted by Pellegrini and Fotheringham (2002), the members of each cluster or nest of alternatives must be specified a priori in the NL model, requiring that space be divided meaningfully without accommodating the full range of spatial substitutability that may occur.”
- Internal migration around the world: comparing distance travelled and its frictional effect (2016, background): “Although modelling migration distance using spatial interaction models has become common (Pellegrini and Fotheringham, 2002), few cross-national comparisons have been attempted.”
- Modeling Micro-Level Crime Location Choice: Application of the Discrete Choice Framework to Crime at Places (2010, unknown): “To correct this situation, the analysis in this article will apply the spatial competition model (Fotheringham et al. 2000; Pellegrini and Fotheringham 2002), a model that is able to estimate the extent to which the choice of a spatial alternative is influenced by the presence and the size of nearby”