Redefining Industrial Symbiosis

By D. Lombardi, P. Laybourn. 2012

423 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ed43478c6b4ad5453437f81dbb8bc515a7cb146

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Judith L. Walls
2. Raymond L. Paquin
3. Han Shi

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Judith L. Walls
2. Raymond L. Paquin
3. D. Lyons
4. T. Domenech
5. D. Lombardi
6. Han Shi
7. Pekka Leskinen
8. Riina Antikainen

In Strategy and Management

1. Raymond L. Paquin
2. Judith L. Walls
3. D. Lyons
4. D. Lombardi
5. Han Shi
6. Pekka Leskinen
7. Riina Antikainen
8. Marianne Thomsen

Citations in the corpus

• Green economy and related concepts: An overview (2016, positive): “…defined as a path to green growth because it engages organizations in a network to foster eco-innovation and encourages them to make new investments and change business practices, and it also stimulates research and development, new businesses, and joint ventures (Lombardi and Laybourn, 2012).”
• Industrial Symbiosis (2012, background): “…or altruistic is also being questioned, and support is growing for Ehrenfeld and Gertler’s (1997) early observation that many synergies are “business as usual” to the organizations involved (see Ashton and Bain 2012; Chertow and Ehrenfeld 2012; Lombardi and Laybourn 2012, in this issue).”
• Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe_ typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy (2019, background): “…the Circular Economy Industrial symbiosis (IS) is a system approach to a more sustainable and integrated industrial system, which identifies business opportunities that leverage underutilised resources (such as materials, energy, water, capacity, expertise, assets etc.) (Lombardi & Laybourn, 2012).”
• Organizational Perspectives of Industrial Symbiosis (2015, background): “…to happen through the exchanges themselves (Ashton, 2008; Baas & Huisingh, 2008; Boons, Montalvo, Quist, & Wagner, 2013; Doménech & Davies, 2011; Lombardi & Laybourn, 2012); may be incremental, radical, or architectural (Boons et al., 2013); and can create interorganizational (Mirata &…”
• Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU (2015, background): “…efficient Europe’ is on clusters, highlighting as best practice the United Kingdom’s National Industrial Symbiosis Programme, which looks to localized open-loop exchanges between industries, and the eco-industrial park at Kalundborg, Denmark (Laybourn and Lombardi, 2012; Lombardi & Laybourn, 2012).”
• Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package (2019, background): “…of institutional (non)change in policy portfolios. also witnessed the development of industry-specific concepts that integrate these ideas, primarily ‘industrial ecology’ (Frosch and Gallopoulos 1989, Jelinski et al. 1992), later reinterpreted as ‘industrial symbiosis’ (Lombardi and Laybourn 2012).”