The Restoration of Plant–Pollinator Interactions in Hay Meadows

By Mikael Lytzau Forup, J. Memmott. 2005

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ecd9a7a5798c63abe07cc7ed333cca83db1272e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The restoration of ecological interactions: plant-pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathlands (2007, background): “Constructing pollen transport networks is a recently developed approach (Forup & Memmott 2005; Gibson et al .”
Connectance of species interaction networks and conservation value: Is it any good to be well connected? (2012, background): “Qualitative No Forup and Memmott, 2005 Bees/wasps-parasitoids on agricultural land-forest gradient Agricultural intensification No expectation No effect None Quantitative Yes Tylianakis et al., 2007 Bees/wasps-parasitoids on agricultural land-forest gradient Agricultural intensification No…”
Flower-strip agri-environment schemes provide diverse and valuable summer flower resources for pollinating insects (2018, background): “Blaauw and Isaacs (2014) recorded 32.6 visits/100 m2/25 min in sown wild-flowers plots (even if they recorded only bees and Syrphidae) and Forup and Memmott (2005) observed 28.6 visits/100 m2/25 min in meadows.”
Enhancing floral resources for pollinators in productive agricultural grasslands (2014, background): “Although legumes are valuable for many insect pollinators (Decourtye et al., 2010; Jannersten, 1984; Mortimer et al., 2006), different pollinator species will show preferences for other plants (Branquart and Hemptinne, 2008; Forup and Memmott, 2005; Stout et al., 1998).”
The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen‐transport networks in a boreal pine forest (2011, methodology): “…potentially biasing effect of pollen contamination, which may have occurred due to heterospecific pollen transfer by visitors between co-flowering plant taxa (e.g. McLernon et al., 1996) or in the light trap and subsequent handling of the moths (see Forup & Memmott, 2005 for a similar approach).”
Restoration of Nontarget Species: Bee Communities and Pollination Function in Riparian Forests (2011, background): “It has been used to characterize pollinator–plant interactions for a variety of different communities in different ecosystems (Jordano 1987; Jordano et al. 2003; Vázquez & Aizen 2004; Forup & Memmott 2005; Morales & Aizen 2006; Vila et al. 2009).”