Heads, Hox and the phylogenetic position of trilobites

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

†Henningsmoenicaris scutula, †Sandtorpia vestrogothiensis gen. et sp. nov. and heterochronic events in early crustacean evolution (2009, background): “A closer relationship of †Trilobita to mandibulates than to chelicerates has already been proposed by earlier publications (Scholtz & Edgecombe 2005, 2006; Waloszek et al. 2005; Hughes et al. 2008).”
The Evolution of Trilobite Body Patterning (2007, background): “…identical or closely comparable in shape Heteronomous: two or more segments distinctly different in shape solution, trilobites evidently shared a basic complement of ocular and appendagebearing segments similar to that of other basal euarthropods (Scholtz & Edgecombe 2005, Waloszek et al. 2005).”
The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: a comparative approach (2006, background): “…(evo-devo) perspective is as an empirical record of the postembryonic development of multiple representatives of an early euarthropod clade (for phylogenetic assessment see Budd 2002; Cotton and Braddy 2004; Edgecombe and Ramsköld 1999; Scholtz and Edgecombe 2005; Walossek and Müller 1990).”