Cluster validity methods: part I

By Maria Halkidi, Yannis Batistakis, Michalis Vazirgiannis. SGMD, 2002

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Clustering is an unsupervised process since there are no predefined classes and no examples that would indicate grouping properties in the data set. The majority of the clustering algorithms behave differently depending on the features of the data set and the initial assumptions for defining groups. Therefore, in most applications the resulting clustering scheme requires some sort of evaluation as regards its validity. Evaluating and assessing the results of a clustering algorithm is the main subject of cluster validity. In this paper we present a review of the clustering validity and methods. More specifically, Part I of the paper discusses the cluster validity approaches based on external and internal criteria.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eba6ce49431e41dd3bf6e66ea699b61fb7505b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Thuy T. T. Nguyen
  2. Grenville J. Armitage
  3. Rui Xu
  4. Sándor Juhász
  5. Donald C. Wunsch II
  6. Ganapati Panda
  7. A. de Pádua Braga
  8. Wolfgang Kastner

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Rui Xu
  2. Grenville J. Armitage
  3. Donald C. Wunsch II
  4. Ganapati Panda
  5. Wolfgang Kastner
  6. Cuong Duc Nguyen
  7. Félix Iglesias
  8. D. T. Pham

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Rui Xu
  2. Donald C. Wunsch II
  3. A. de Pádua Braga
  4. Wolfgang Kastner
  5. Cuong Duc Nguyen
  6. R. R. de Medeiros
  7. Carla Caldeira Takahashi
  8. Félix Iglesias

Citations in the corpus