Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and Revision (CESD and CESD-R).

By W. Eaton, Corey Smith, Michele L. Ybarra, C. Muntaner, A. Tien. 2004

1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eaa96e806c92e3a8e064f850890bf86d16cee96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Nicholas T. Van Dam
2. G. Faulkner
3. M. Earleywine
4. G. Mammen

Citations in the corpus

• Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale--Revised (CESD-R): pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. (2011, methodology): “Please select options that reflect how often you have felt this way in the past week or so” (modified from Eaton et al., 2004; p. 33).”
• Physical activity and the prevention of depression: a systematic review of prospective studies. (2013, methodology): “For example, the cut-off score for “significant” depressive symptomatology using the CESD is typically 16.(55) Although four studies used this cutoff,(25,26,42,45) other studies using the same measure, and sometimes different versions of the CESD, utilized lower threshold cut-offs that may have led ”