Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology, pathogenicity, and disease management
By S. Pande, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, G. Kishore, B. Bayaa, P. Gaur, C. Gowda, T. Bretag, J. Crouch. 2005
250 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e9dcf556afe11284a1ae5333e41e7f722719a78
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
- Todd A. Anderson
- George P. Cobb
- Baohong Zhang
- Xiaoping Pan
- P. Gaur
- A. Jukanti
- Rajeev K. Varshney
- Mamta Sharma
Citations in the corpus
- An Update on Genetic Resistance of Chickpea to Ascochyta Blight (2016, background): “rabiei life cycle contributes to variability within the pathogen population, which may generate a new combination of virulence genes and the development of new pathotypes [11].”
- Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights on grain legumes (2007, background): “In contrast, in Canadian and Australian chickpea fields, infected seeds and chickpea stubble are considered to be the primary sources of inoculum, although airborne ascospores are of relevance for long-distance dispersal (Chongo et al. 2004; Pande et al. 2005).”
- Plant microRNA: a small regulatory molecule with big impact. (2006, background): “Pathogen infection causes about a 30% yield loss for a majority of crops and fruits (Zhang et al., 2000; Pande et al., 2005).”
- Impact of Genomic Technologies on Chickpea Breeding Strategies (2012, background): “resistance to ascochyta blight [32], BGM [33] and any other disease.”