The Hippocampus , Memory , Review and Place Cells : Is It Spatial Memory or a Memory Space ? in humans and nonhuman primates
By Howard Eichenbaum, P. Dudchenko, E. Wood, M. Shapiro, H. Tanila. 1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- György Buzsáki
- Y. Dudai
- Howard Eichenbaum
- Dharshan Kumaran
- E. T. Rolls
- Edvard I. Moser
- L. R. Squire
- Alison R. Preston
Citations in the corpus
- Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance (2000, background): “Alternatively, the hippocampal formation functions in episodic memor”
- Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. (2008, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. although new evidence suggests that position is only one of several facets of experience stored in the hippocampal network (Eichenbaum et al. 1999, Leutgeb et al. 2005b).”
- Temporal encoding of place sequences by hippocampal cell assemblies. (2006, background): “In humans, the hippocampus and associated structures are believed to support episodic and semantic memories (Scoville and Milner, 1957; Tulving, 1972; Squire, 1992; Eichenbaum et al., 1999).”
- Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep (2007, background): “However, the reactivation in these studies lacks the specificity presumably required for episodic memory, which includes a cascade of temporally ordered events encoded by a unique sequence of activation of different neuronal populations within the cortex, within the hippocampus, or bot”
- Theta rhythm of navigation: Link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory (2005, background): “Some of these ideas and the links between them have been expressed implicitly or embedded in specific frameworks previously (Rawlins and Tsaltas, 1983; Kanerva, 1988; Alvarez and Squire, 1994; McClelland et al., 1995; Levy, 1996; McNaughton et al., 1996; Muller et al., 1996b; Rolls, 1996; Solomon an”
- Entorhinal Cortex Lesions Disrupt the Relational Organization of Memory in Monkeys (2004, background): “…Copyright © 2004 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/04/249811-15$15.00/0 Together, these findings suggest that relational information processing may be a fundamental operating characteristic of memory mediated by the mammalian hippocampal system (Eichenbaum et al., 1999).”
- Hippocampal neurons encode information about different types of memory episodes occurring in the same location. (2000, methodology): “Applied to the current find- 1998; Eichenbaum et al., 1999; Lisman, 1999). ings, this view would suggest that the animal alternates between a “left-turn reference frame” and a “right-turn Experimental Procedures reference frame,” consistent with a key role of trial- Subjectsspecific information…”
- The Vertebrate mesolimbic reward system and social behavior network: A comparative synthesis (2011, background): “Functional studies in mammals suggest that the HIP is not only involved in spatial memory, but more generally in the storage of repeated experiences (Eichenbaum et al., 1999).”
- The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions (2012, background): “By representing features common to multiple events similarly, hippocampal codes can capture regularities shared across different experiences and, in doing so, may act as “nodes” that link distinct behavioral episodes (Eichenbaum et al., 1999).”
- The prefontral cortex and cognitive control (2000, background): “: it has neurons that show conjunctive tuning for the co-occurrence of sensory feature”
- A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness (2010, methodology): “All models of hippocampal function that were generated from animal studie”
- Sequential Replay of Non-spatial Task States in the Human Hippocampus (2018, methodology): “Specifically, our model included the following fixed effects: 473 (1) the distance between states, D, which was the regressor of interest, and as regressors of 474 no interest (2) the transition probabilities obtained in the above mentioned noise simulations, 475 T ( ), (3) an orthogonal quadratic p”