The Evolutionary Basis of Rigidity: Locks in Cells, Minds, and Society

By Marten Scheffer, Frances Westley. 2007

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Feedbacks leading to alternative stable modes of behavior occur on levels varying from the cell and the mind to societies. The tendency to lock into a certain pattern comes at the cost of the ability to adjust to new situations. The resulting rigidity limits the ability of persons, groups, and companies to respond to new problems, and some even suggest that it may have contributed to the collapse of ancient societies. In the face of these negative effects, it may seem surprising that lock-in situations are so ubiquitous. Here, we show that the tendency to lock into one of several alternative modes usually serves an apparent purpose. In cells, it filters out noise, and allows a well-defined and consistent behavior once a certain threshold is passed. Basically, the same holds for the attitudes and behavior of individuals and groups. This functionality is not surprising as it has evolved through selection for fitness. Understanding why rigidity makes sense may help in finding ways to avoid traps in situations where flexible response and innovation are needed.

Subfields: Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e8cc6c62084c0fb06bc16acc317bdecda12aa85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. I. Darnhofer

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. I. Darnhofer

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. J. Fairweather
  2. I. Darnhofer

Citations in the corpus