Choosing the two finalists

By Kfir Eliaz, Michael Richter, Ariel Rubinstein. 2011

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e7cef72b6f068b35dd1a20fe0c4eede779c904f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Marco Mariotti
2. Paola Manzini
3. Adam Szeidl
4. B. Kőszegi
5. Michaela Pagel
6. Matthew Rabin
7. Paulo Natenzon
8. Andreas Fuster

In General Decision Sciences

1. Marco Mariotti
2. Paola Manzini
3. Adam Szeidl
4. B. Kőszegi
5. Michaela Pagel
6. Matthew Rabin
7. Paulo Natenzon
8. K. Ericson

Citations in the corpus

• A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice (2011, result): “Our theory of consideration-set determination is distantly related to that of Eliaz, Richter and Rubinstein (2010), who axiomatically characterize procedures for choosing a two-element consideration set (or “finalists”).”
• Choice by Lexicographic Semiorders (2009, background): “Cherepanov, Feddersen and Sandroni [4]; Eliaz, Richter and Rubinstein [6]; Masatlioglu and Ok [22] and [23]; Masatlioglu and Nakajima [24]; Masatlioglu, Nakajima and Ozbay [25]; Salant and Rubinstein [30]; Tyson [35], beside those already discussed).”
• A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice (2013, result): “Our theory of consideration-set determination is distantly related to that of Eliaz, Richter and Rubinstein (2010), who axiomatically characterize procedures for choosing a two-element consideration set (or “finalists”).”