Behavioral and demographic changes following the loss of the breeding female in cooperatively breeding marmosets

By C. Lázaro-Perea, C. S. S. Castro, R. Harrison, A. Araújo, M. F. Arruda, C. Snowdon. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Women's lives there, here, then, now: a review of women's ecological and demographic constraints cross-culturally (2005, background): “Marmoset females may kill other females’ offspring (Digby, 1995; Lazaro-Perea et al., 2000).”
Are subordinates always stressed? A comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates. (2003, background): “…in others, it can involve the formation of coalitional alliances (macaques: Bercovitch, 1988; langurs: Sommer, 1988; chimpanzees: de Waal, 1982) combined with overt aggression, or can be inherited (common marmoset: Abbott, 1984; Lazaro-Perea et al., 2000; cotton top tamarin: Savage et al., 1997).”
How demographic processes shape animal social networks (2019, background): “2017), and there is evidence that loss of key individuals can change social dynamics within cooperative breeding groups (e.g., Hannon et al. 1985; Lazaro-Perea et al. 2000).”
Aggression and submission reflect reproductive conflict between females in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta (2006, background): “…1997; Schaffner and Caine 2000; Bennett and Faulkes 2000), but frequent aggression between females within groups occurs when a dominant dies or leaves the group (Lazaro-Perea et al. 2000; O’Riain et al. 2000; Zack and Rabenold 1989) or when unrelated males immigrate (Cooney and Bennett 2000).”