Progression of Therapy Research and Clinical Application of Treatment Require Better Understanding of the Change Process

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Science (2006, background): “Building a progressive discipline requires a pragmatically useful and generative theory (Hayes, 1998a), good data on theoretically important processes (Follette, 1995; Kazdin, 2001 ), and a dynamic relationship between applied and basic research (Hayes, 1998b).”
Reenvisioning Clinical Science: Unifying the Discipline to Improve the Public Health (2014, unknown): “The framework described in the current article delineates specific stages of intervention development research that is inspired by and consistent with calls to action to identify mechanisms of change as a way of improving interventions (e.g., Borkovec & Castonguay, 1998; Hayes, Long, Levin, & Follet”
Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcome: Meta-Analytic Findings and Their Implications for Practice and Research (2004, background): “Notably, Kazdin (2001) argued for greater attention to answering questions regarding how and why psychotherapy works while simultaneously calling for continued attention to identifying treatments that work.”