Cost and performance model for redox flow batteries

By Vilayanur V. Viswanathan, Aladsair J. Crawford, D. Stephenson, Soowhan Kim, Wen Wang, Bin Li, G. Coffey, E. Thomsen, G. Graff, P. Balducci and 2 more. 2014

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dfb12518af1c628fb852d7153242d345cacda03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Yikai Zeng
2. Lei Wei
3. T. Zhao
4. Xuelong Zhou
5. L. Zeng
6. L. An

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Yikai Zeng
2. Lei Wei
3. T. Zhao
4. Xuelong Zhou
5. L. Zeng
6. L. An
7. R. Marcilla
8. J. Tübke

Citations in the corpus

• Copper nanoparticle-deposited graphite felt electrodes for all vanadium redox flow batteries (2016, methodology): “According to the recent cost and performance model built by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [19], it is reported that the power stack alone accounts for around 35% of a 4 MW h VRFB’s entire cost.”
• A comparative study of all-vanadium and iron-chromium redox flow batteries for large-scale energy storage (2015, background): “31 [35] Gaskets, bolts, end plates, $/m(2) 14 [30] Stack manufactory 10% of stack material [19] Heat exchanger, $/kW 84 [30] PCS, $/kW 210 [30] Thermal insulation material, $/m(2) 15 [34] Tank, $/gallon 0.”