Random Forest Classification for Mangrove Land Cover Mapping Using Landsat 5 TM and Alos Palsar Imageries
By R. Jhonnerie, V. Siregar, B. Nababan, L. Prasetyo, S. Wouthuyzen. 2015
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract The objective of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of random forest classification rule using object based image analysis (OBIA) application (eCognition Developer) and the results were compared with common pixel-based classification algorithm (maximum likelihood/ML) for mangrove land cover mapping in Kembung River, Bengkalis Island, Indonesia. Seven data input model derived from Landsat 5TM bands, ALOS PALSAR FBD, and spectral transformations (NDVI, NDWI, NDBI) were examined by both classifiers. Feature objects statistical parameters were selected and implemented on random forest classifier. Overall accuracy (OA) as well as user and producer accuracies and Kappa statistic were used to compare classification results. Our results showed that the more data model used produced higher overall accuracy and kappa statistics for RF classifier. For each data input model, random forest classifier has higher overall accuracy than maximum likelihood. The best mangrove discrimination in RF classifier was achieved when the combination of Landsat 5 TM, SAR, and spectral transformation were used, while in ML classifier, the best mangrove discrimination was achieved when the combination of Landsat 5 TM and ALOS PALSAR was used. The overall accuracy achieved by RF classifier was 81.1% and 0.76 for Kappa statistic. Meanwhile, for ML classifier, the overall accuracy achieved was 77.7% and 0.71 for Kappa statistic.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dfa4504aac83d05fa352bdb1a3529a5ae7c39cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery (2017, methodology): “In fact, most studies from our searched list used the MLC method as one of the criteria to compare to other machine learning algorithms [11,29,30].”