Identifying specificity groups in the T cell receptor repertoire

By J. Glanville, Huang Huang, Allison N. Nau, O. Hatton, Lisa E. Wagar, F. Rubelt, X. Ji, A. Han, S. Krams, Christina Pettus and 7 more. Nature, 2017

901 citations recorded by the source corpus.

T cell receptor (TCR) sequences are very diverse, with many more possible sequence combinations than T cells in any one individual. Here we define the minimal requirements for TCR antigen specificity, through an analysis of TCR sequences using a panel of peptide and major histocompatibility complex (pMHC)-tetramer-sorted cells and structural data. From this analysis we developed an algorithm that we term GLIPH (grouping of lymphocyte interactions by paratope hotspots) to cluster TCRs with a high probability of sharing specificity owing to both conserved motifs and global similarity of complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequences. We show that GLIPH can reliably group TCRs of common specificity from different donors, and that conserved CDR3 motifs help to define the TCR clusters that are often contact points with the antigenic peptides. As an independent validation, we analysed 5,711 TCRβ chain sequences from reactive CD4 T cells from 22 individuals with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. We found 141 TCR specificity groups, including 16 distinct groups containing TCRs from multiple individuals. These TCR groups typically shared HLA alleles, allowing prediction of the likely HLA restriction, and a large number of M. tuberculosis T cell epitopes enabled us to identify pMHC ligands for all five of the groups tested. Mutagenesis and de novo TCR design confirmed that the GLIPH-identified motifs were critical and sufficient for shared-antigen recognition. Thus the GLIPH algorithm can analyse large numbers of TCR sequences and define TCR specificity groups shared by TCRs and individuals, which should greatly accelerate the analysis of T cell responses and expedite the identification of specific ligands.

Subfields: Immunology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3de1460967e24deaa3a39479cc6ef658984aeaff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023, background): “Transcript locations can be aggregated to obtain count matrices and spatial coordinates at single-cell level.”
Genomic features of response to combination immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2018, background): “…neoantigenclonality (McGranahan et al., 2016), fitness (Luksza et al., 2017), and interactions with T cell receptor binding (Glanville et al., 2017) are critical, especially aspersonalized vaccine strategies targeting tumor-specific predicted neoantigens are now under way…”
VDJdb: a curated database of T-cell receptor sequences with known antigen specificity (2017, background): “Accordingly, VDJdb can be used as a benchmark for novel machine learning strategies designed to identify targeted antigens from primary TCR sequence data (20,21).”
HLA variation and disease (2018, methodology): “94) . pathophysiological settings 95 , and the experimental use of peptide–HLA tetramers is increasingly being cou pled to newer mass cytometry 96 , TCR sequencing and computational technologies 97 .”
Modern Hopfield Networks and Attention for Immune Repertoire Classification (2020, background): “, 2007), and (c) only subsequences within the sequences determine whether binding to a pathogen is possible (Dash et al., 2017; Glanville et al., 2017; Akbar et al., 2019; Springer et al., 2020; Fischer et al., 2019).”
TCRmodel: high resolution modeling of T cell receptors from sequence (2018, background): “While sequence-based insights have been made based on several of these datasets (8,9), high resolution 3D structural information on TCRs can provide critical insights into the basis of their antigen targeting and specificity (7,10), and experimental structure determination of more than a small set o”