Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories

By S. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, John Preskill. Science, 2011

561 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Quantum Leap? Quantum computers are expected to be able to solve some of the most difficult problems in mathematics and physics. It is not known, however, whether quantum field theories (QFTs) can be simulated efficiently with a quantum computer. QFTs are used in particle and condensed matter physics and have an infinite number of degrees of freedom; discretization is necessary to simulate them digitally. Jordan et al. (p. 1130; see the Perspective by Hauke et al.) present an algorithm for the efficient simulation of a particular kind of QFT (with quartic interactions) and estimate the error caused by discretization. Even for the most difficult case of strong interactions, the run time of the algorithm was polynomial (rather than exponential) in parameters such as the number of particles, their energy, and the prescribed precision, making it much more efficient than the best classical algorithms. A quantum computer may be able to efficiently simulate theories used to describe particle scattering in accelerators. Quantum field theory reconciles quantum mechanics and special relativity, and plays a central role in many areas of physics. We developed a quantum algorithm to compute relativistic scattering probabilities in a massive quantum field theory with quartic self-interactions (ϕ4 theory) in spacetime of four and fewer dimensions. Its run time is polynomial in the number of particles, their energy, and the desired precision, and applies at both weak and strong coupling. In the strong-coupling and high-precision regimes, our quantum algorithm achieves exponential speedup over the fastest known classical algorithm.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dc2ed25682ef3d69f12e0d8e55b18954ab49745

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Göran Wendin
  2. Franco Nori
  3. Ryan Babbush
  4. Craig Gidney
  5. Jarrod R. McClean
  6. John Preskill
  7. Nathan Wiebe
  8. Hartmut Neven

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Franco Nori
  2. Göran Wendin
  3. Sahel Ashhab
  4. I. Georgescu
  5. John Preskill
  6. Craig Gidney
  7. Peter Zoller
  8. Ryan Babbush

Citations in the corpus