Litigation Risk, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings

By Ramgopal Venkataraman, Joseph P. Weber, Michael Willenborg. 2008

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d928acfcdac4fe5d2eb4dec43a0c08b22e67002

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. C. Zutter
2. Scott B. Smart
3. Simon S. M. Ho
4. F. Zhang
5. Kinsun Tam
6. A. Li
7. Thomas J. Boulton
8. Tobias Svanström

In Economics and Econometrics

1. C. Zutter
2. Scott B. Smart
3. F. Zhang
4. Thomas J. Boulton
5. Tobias Svanström

Citations in the corpus

• Non-audit Services and Audit Quality: Evidence from Private Firms (2013, methodology): “Modified Jones models have often been used in research (see Becker et al , 1998 ; Johnson et al , 2002 ; Gul et al , 2003 ; Krishnan, 2003 ; Ferguson et al , 2004 ; Venkatamaran et al , 2008 ).”
• Earnings Quality and International IPO Underpricing (2011, positive): “Venkataraman et al. (2008) overturn this emerging conventional wisdom with their finding that pre-IPO audited accruals are not opportunistically high.”
• CEO Gender, Ethical Leadership, and Accounting Conservatism (2015, background): “Following Bentley et al. (2013), Gong et al. (2013), Francis et al. (1994), Goh and Li (2011), and Venkataraman et al. (2008), we use the following primary SIC codes to represent litigious industries: 2833–2836 (biotechnology), 3570–3577 (computer equipment), 3600–3674 (electronics), 5200–5961…”