On Some non Asymptotic Bounds for the Euler Scheme
By Vincent Lemaire, Stéphane Menozzi. 2010
66 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We obtain non asymptotic bounds for the Monte Carlo algorithm associated to the Euler discretization of some diffusion processes. The key tool is the Gaussian concentration satisfied by the density of the discretization scheme. This Gaussian concentration is derived from a Gaussian upper bound of the density of the scheme and a modification of the so-called "Herbst argument" used to prove Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. We eventually establish a Gaussian lower bound for the density of the scheme that emphasizes the concentration is sharp.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d91ffd2b149d0fd6b04abefb064796b65016407
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Numerical Analysis
In Statistics and Probability
- Alain Oliviero Durmus
- Eric Moulines
- Daichi Taguchi
- Hoang-Long Ngo
- Francis R. Bach
- Arnak S. Dalalyan
- Aymeric Dieuleveut
- Gareth O. Roberts
Citations in the corpus
- Strong convergence for the Euler-Maruyama approximation of stochastic differential equations with discontinuous coefficients (2016, methodology): “establishthe strong rateof convergence of EMapproximation for SDEs with discontinuous drift are either the Krylov estimate (see [13, 6]) or theGaussianboundestimateforthedensityofthenumericalsolution([15,20,22]). However, these estimates seem no longer available for SDEs with discontinuous diffusion”
- Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (2015, background): “Compared to the related works by [23], [24], [25] and [26], we establish not only the weak convergence of the weighted empirical measure of the path to the target distribution but a much stronger convergence in total variation, similarly to [12], where the strongly log-concave case is considered.”