New strategies for new physics search in B → K*νν̄, B → Kνν̄ and B → Xsνν̄ decays

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

New physics in B→K∗μμ? (2013, background): “Using the results in [54], we find that CNP 9 ' −1 implies a slight enhancement of the branching ratios BR(B → K∗νν̄) and BR(B → Kνν̄) of the order of 15%.”
Model-independent constraints on new physics in b → s transitions (2011, background): “Its contribution to the mixing amplitude can be written at the scale mZ as [93] 〈Bs|H|B̄s〉〈Bs|H|B̄s〉 = 4αs(2)w πS0(xt) (Z(2) L − 3.”
Rare $B$ Decays as Tests of the Standard Model (2016, background): “An angular analysis of the B → K∗(→ Kπ)νν̄ decay would allow to access the K∗ longitudinal polarisation fraction FL that is sensitive to right-handed currents beyond the SM [269].”
FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles (2018, background): “[73] W.”
An explicit Z′-boson explanation of the B → K∗μ+μ− anomaly (2013, background): “Note that this is a rather model-independent conclusion following from SU(2)L invariance, lepton-flavour universality and the absence/smallness of right-handed currents [8, 9, 39].”
Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental Composite Higgs model (2018, background): “The relevant effective Lagrangian for this process is [117, 118]”