Trade and the Great Divergence: The Family Connection

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

If Technology Has Arrived Everywhere, Why Has Income Diverged? (2013, unknown): “Galor and Mountford (2006) argue that trade affected asymmetrically the fertility decisions in developed and developing economies, due to their different initial endowments of human capital, leading to different evolutions of productivity growth.”
Demographic transitions: analyzing the effects of mortality on fertility (2008, background): “…less frequency, among which we can mention the decline in the gender wage gap (Galor and Weil 1996), the reduction in the importance of child labour (Hazan and Berdugo 2002, Doepke 2004), Darwinian evolution (Galor and Moav 2002) and the e¤ects of trade specialization (Galor and Mountford 2006).”
International Migration, Transfers of Norms and Home Country Fertility (2008, unknown): “Following De la Croix and Doepke (2003, 2004), Galor and Mountford (2006), Moav (2005) or Mountford and Rapoport (2007), adults utility function has two arguments, the amount of consumption and the total expected income of children.”
Dualism and cross-country growth regressions (2006, background): “(1997), Falkinger and Grossman (2005), Galor, Moav and Vollrath (2005), Galor and Mountford (2004, 2006) , Galor and Weil (2000), Gemmell and Lloyd (2002), Gollin, Parente and Rogerson (2002, 2002), Graham and Temple (2006), Greenwood and Seshadri (2005), Greenwood and Uysal (2005), Gylfason and Zo”